Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Time we change our sports?


I was sitting in my window last weekend, watching children play various sports in this huge ground opposite my building. I was following them, from cricket to football to volleyball and so on. And something struck. We have always believed that sports teach us stuff... but today, it was interesting to note how they teach us stuff that might mirror the society they originate from and those where they flourish.

Take cricket. There's one batsman and one bowler. Rest all are others. Their position may strategically have value but socially, in the structure of cricket, they are not as valuable as the role of a batsman, followed by the bowler. This is more apparent in gully cricket, where there's no team as such. Rather children take turns for batting. You ask a child who plays cricket, and 99% times you will hear that he prefers being a batsman. In fact I have seen insances where children cheat – they play their part of batting and then go home excusing themselves with “mummy is calling”. Everyone on the ground wishes to bowl the batsman, so that they can take his position. We know so many good batsmen or bowlers. Barring few exceptions, how many good fielders are remembered (and given a chance to endorse products)? Doesn't it in a way reflect the society where certain hierarchy is DNA-fied in the its structure? And where else this sport could have originated other the Great Britain, which has a history of hierarchical social setup? And where else could it gain such popularity other than India (and its neighbouring countries), which is so profoundly fixated with its love for class, caste and creed?

Well this is not about discussing how good or bad cricket is. The sport may have its own merits. However, I am more concerned about the lessons we are planning for our children on the field. All I am asking is, if we are really looking for solutions to such problems of social stratification, shall we not relook into what's going on in the schools (and not just classrooms) and streets and sports grounds? It has long been established that what's going on in the classrooms is not the most right thing that can happen to our children. Shall we also give a thought to what's going on with them on the field? And more so when The Great Britain itself has successfully shifted it's focus from cricket to football? Isn't it time we change or transform the sports we play?

P.S.: I am just thinking aloud. I may not be right in what I am proposing. It's just a point of view. I invite all the readers to post their views and have a good discussion here. And would really appreciate the cricket-lovers to give it an objective thought before presenting their views :)

22 comments:

mystic said...

I believe - thats how the whole nature evolved "survival of the fittest" and we all try to be the best/fittest.

Very smart observation! Its not only sports, its everywhere in society.

Clueless said...

I think its more to do with what is considered important in a sport and this is irrespective of which team sport you play- football or cricket. Even in football you wont remember the defense, you will remember the striker. it is about how many goals you scored rather than saves- not defending anything here, just giving a perspective. What we fail at irrespective of which sport is telling the team each role is important and critical . Like in Education too, its important for them to see what they are good at and excel in that
Also if you ask me I remember Jonty Rhodes- guess its about how see yourself within the larger team

Greta Lopes said...

Go back in history to the introduction of cricket as a sport in India. Back then the Maharaja's and Princely States had their close associations to the British. A lot of the British traditions and culture percolated into the Indian society through these higher ranks.
Think about it, do you think cricket got introduced to our side by the "Lagaan" team of India?? Would it really get it's validation as an accepted sport. It had to come through the rulers, "Kshatriyas" - hence the sport has such glory. Who do you think were the top batsmen and bowlers then?? Do I really need to answer the question? It's a matter of pride and privilege to be the batsman and bowler... So isn't it obvious our little kid will be throwing the tantrum when denied his share of glory...

Rohit Kumar said...

@ mystic
Frankly I am not too sure about this “survival of the fittest” concept used loosely at many places. It's coined in the terms of evolutions, fine. But can we really use it, within the context of our social milieu, I am not too sure (please note, I am not sure.. which means it may or may be). I think it's a little more complex than a lion being more fitter than a dear and hence has a higher chances to survival. In case of human beings, I think the "fittest" is not the fittest by it's own virtue all the time (as a lion is) but also by the virtue of others seeing or percieving him to be. And as you rightly said, it's everywhere in society... so is my point. However, I go beyond this and ask, if it is everywhere in society, is that the right thing? Or is there any other way to exist? And if there is shall we aspire for that? And if there is not, why the fuck do all feminists, socialists, sexual eqaulity seekers and suck people exist anyway?


@ Clueless (Priya) Rightly said, Priya. In fact it was interesting to get the insights from your project. Football may have similar structural issues as I pointed thru cricket. As you rightly mentioned, we defintely fail to coach our children on the value of “each player's value” in a team sport, and so in the social set up. My worry is, as we realize this, how do we go about changing some of such structures? How do we make people believe in their own role as important in the society and other's sharing that view, as you mentioned in your jonty Rhodes' point?

@ Greta
Thank you for sharing this. Some interesting points indeed. What you say make sense to me. And i don't blame our children for all the trantrums. It's more on us, the teachers, how we prepare our lesson plans.

@All, I looks to me that we more or less converge to a similar viewpoint, which is, the sports (specially team sports) have this issue of class hierachy within itself. And if it has, how do we restructure it in a way that we retain the value of the sports but are able to remove it's social vices? or can we at all?

Keep posting, friends. I am learning from all your view points. Thanks again, for sharing!

Unknown said...

Rohit, It's the same in all aspects of life - it is the individual who is the one who strikes the ball whom everybody notices. We fail to recognize all the spokes of the wheel and the importance of each one of them. Even one spoke can't be missing - the wheel will gradually lose its shape!!! Sadly, society is becoming so very hierarchical that we only notice, compliment, acknowledge the striker, the show master,call it whatever. Do we even acknowledge the contributions of the many others???
There was a time many many years ago when it was common to see coloured, glittery paper fixed between each spoke - it was to enhance the beauty of the bicycle, to give it the distinct look. No spoke was left out, each was painstakingly decorated its presence acknowledged. Come to think of it, we no longer see the spokes decorated!!! Ironical, don't you think?

Sourav Kundu said...

dude, what exactly were you trying to say? I've read the post a few times but the point somehow does not come out clear and strong.

Based on what I've known, cricket as a sport does not only encourage teamwork but also inculcates in the individual an inspiration to be specialized... batting, bowling, wicket keeping, slip fielding, point and cover fielding.

So, am I missing the picture?

Greta Lopes said...

@Buzz Look at this picture now...
Take all your "specializations of cricket" - batting, bowling and let's consider wicket keeping... etc under one umbrella of fielding.
Now based on the importance and "spotlight" accorded to them, you'll spot a pyramid formed or hierarchy.
And as for team work, the Indian cricket "team" ranks poorly on that scale too. Cricket in India is driven by individualistic success and the performance of one player. Check the hierarchy for which player that could possibly be...
Now make the correlation to the basic functioning of our society...Yeah hierarchy all through the way...Well...
And specialization exits in every sport...so does team work. But in cricket, largely, one tends to overshadow the others in the process diminishing its value. Check again how many people want to be fielders...

P.S.: @Rohit Sorry I kind off replied on your behalf...

Greta Lopes said...

@Buzz Look at this picture now...
Take all your "specializations of cricket" - batting, bowling and let's consider wicket keeping... etc under one umbrella of fielding.
Now based on the importance and "spotlight" accorded to them, you'll spot a pyramid formed or hierarchy.
And as for team work, the Indian cricket "team" ranks poorly on that scale too. Cricket in India is driven by individualistic success and the performance of one player. Check the hierarchy for which player that could possibly be...
Now make the correlation to the basic functioning of our society...Yeah hierarchy all through the way...Well...
And specialization exits in every sport...so does team work. But in cricket, largely, one tends to overshadow the others in the process diminishing its value. Check again how many people want to be fielders...

P.S.: @Rohit Sorry I kind off replied on your behalf...

Sourav Kundu said...

@Greta, Rohit,
Why pick cricket? Or for that matter why pick the god-of-cricket?

If Sachin Tendulkar is the greatest cricketer [as per me] then what is wrong in that? He is our hero. And don't we like heros? Then why glorify father-of-the-nation Gandhi or for that matter any individual.

Afterall it is the individual which makes the society.

Coming back to cricket, I have never known Sachin Tendulkar to ever place himself ahead of the team or the nation. He is greatness personified. Period.

Sourav Kundu said...

@Rohit,
In five sentences can you outline what exactly you were trying to communicate in the blog?

Rohit Kumar said...

@ Buzz - I had said specifically in the blog that cricket lovers are not to respond with emotions. I think you missed that note :)

Anyways... just to answer your queries,

Why pick cricket? Or for that matter why pick the god-of-cricket?

- The blog is not intended to downplay cricket. Quoting from the blog, “Well this is not about discussing how good or bad cricket is. The sport may have its own merits.” I have taken Cricket as an example to explain what I wanted to talk about in the blog, which i think you have unfortunately missed :( I have taken cricket as the example, for 3 specific reasons:
1) Coz most of us Indians can relate it to...
2) the sports ground I was looking at, had maximum children playing cricket than other sports (And I am NOT saying that it’s something wrong!!)
3) It is actually one the many sports which is highly hierarchy-ised.

If Sachin Tendulkar is the greatest cricketer [as per me] then what is wrong in that?

- First of all, I have NOT talked about Sachin in the entire blog!!! I respect him too for what he is. But let’s face the fact, he is not the greatest cricketer. At max, he may be the greatest batsman, but is he the best at bowling and fielding and wicket keeping and many other functional roles of the game? I don’t think so. And since you have brought his name, which I have purposefully avoided in the blog, let me use him to explain my point, which is, you have happily coined someone, who may at best be the greatest batsman, as the greatest cricketer. So are you equating cricket to be only about batting?

He is our hero. And don't we like heros? Then why glorify father-of-the-nation Gandhi or for that matter any individual. Afterall it is the individual which makes the society.

- I am not against celebrating an inidividual’s achievements. Rather, that can actually be our source of inspiration. However, the point I wished to make is how right it is to celebrate a particular role within a structure over other roles (For example, to celebrate the role of a batsman over fielders... taking it back to the society, the role of a software engineer against a sweeper or may be even a teacher). My issue is NOT with a game but the way it has the potential to

Coming back to cricket, I have never known Sachin Tendulkar to ever place himself ahead of the team or the nation. He is greatness personified. Period.

- I would not want to reply to this. This is NOT the point of the discussion of this blog.
The key point of this blog is to understand if we are echoing the erroneous, class and strata-driven social structure in our sports as well. And if yes, we better have a check, since, as you rightly said, sports teaches us a lot. Some questions that I am posing are - is it not ok for my child to want to be a fielder if he has an interest towards that and excel into it, rather than being forced (externally by people around or even self, by gauging the role’s social value)? Should human beings not choose their role in this world as per their interest for the role itself, rather than some second-hand respect the role is currently tagged to? And in this regard, do we need to move away or change the way some sports, which MAY have class-driven structure, are played?

Hope I am at the least, able to communicate what I wanted to say :)

Sourav Kundu said...

Ok, so the purpose is a lot clearer now.

Q: Should human beings not choose their role in this world as per their interest for the role itself, rather than some second-hand respect the role is currently tagged to? :UQ

Absolutely! But how practical is that Rohit?

At this point in time, the whole and sole aim of a middle class family is to see to it that the kids make it through graduation with high grades so that their lives are secured. And you know why? That is because the previous generation has seen what it means to be in the line of -have nots... they have seen what we call as "abhava". You are talking about people wanting to do as their heart desires while a huge population goes to sleep without even two square meals a day.

Delhi bahot durr hai mere bhai! But, yes... I do not deny that fact that following the heart is a great thing to think of, but how practical from a holistic point of view is something that I have my doubts on.

Unknown said...

Every role has its own unique contribution in a structure - be it sports, be it corporate, be it home, be it governance, any set up for that matter. Everybody in the structure is important - but I feel we acknowledge the 'not in the limelight' roles only when the person holding that role is not around and it is affecting the flow of things.

Yes, parents do want their kids to do better, but that is irrespective of where they come from. It's just that it is more evident in the so-called middle class.
No matter what, people do reach out to do what their heart desires, it's just the timing which differs. Some have the good fortune of doing it from day one but a majority take time. Even while doing something which might not be close to your heart, people work with the knowledge of what they would want to do, so they are in many ways working towards that. I think that is the driving force which keeps one going.

Anonymous said...

Your blog is very interesting and showing a new view of how children playing sports. Beside that, it make a different from how the 80s kids are different from the 21 century kids.

As those 80s born kids are more likely interested in outdoor activities but 21 century kids are more with computers games

the ebay lady said...

Lovely blog!!! I just followed you. I am new to blogger, and hoping you'll follow back. Thanks in advance!

Hotels Discount said...

very nice blog...

hi, friend... choose allmaldiveshotels as your favourite website, and get special discount up 75% for the best BOOKING :-)

de engineur said...

Insightful post. I was blog walking and stumble upon your blog, followed you and wud definately come back when there's new entry/ies.

Greetings,
Floyd, Malaysia

Rohit Kumar said...

@Ryuki, Floyd... Thanks for your comments... keep reading.. :)

kunik said...

very nice...

Sundarraj Kaushik said...

Actually Rohit what you have asked is very well explained in this post http://hbr.org/2010/06/column-you-are-what-you-measure/ar/1.
The articles says one delivers what one is measured by. The same could hold for one wishes to do what is measured.
In a game of cricket what is measured is who scored the maximum runs, in football what is measured is who scored the maximum goals, in all games what is measured is who wins.
So everybody wants to be a batsmen in Cricket, everybody wants to be the center forward in football and everybody wants to win irrespective of the game.
While playing a particular role in the game applies to team games where different roles are played by different members of the team, individual sports what matters is winning.
Similarly a person is measured by the wealth she has and so everybody wants to make money as that is the measure of a person's success and hence all the corruption we see.
Similarly students are rated by the marks they score in the exams and not by the creativity shown or the in depth analysis they may be capable of. So everybody learns by rote and gets the maximum mark.
The only way to get out of this rut is to change the measured parameters as has been rightly indicated in the article.
We can change our measuring mechanism for ourselves, but to get the world (or even our close ones) to accept those parameters is another matter.

Colt Mcnabb said...

http://cmcnasty.blogspot.com/

Devesh said...

Wonderful observation and nice photos for the post :)